there's no denying that the met bullpen is terrible and has been so most of the season. night after night, they collapse almost on cue. even last night, after a huge 9th inning grand slam to take a comfortable 3-run lead, they tried their best to blow it but barely missed out. tonight, 4 walks in the bottom of the ninth in a tie game (ok, two were intentional, but still...) were painful to witness.
not receiving enough of the blame however is the offense- almost automatic in the first 3 innings but non-existent in the last 3. last night's 9th inning 4-spot was an anomaly. tonight, runners left on base in each of the last 4 innings, including one in scoring position in the 7th and 9th. most of the times the bullpen has blown leads, they've been able to because the offense has not been able to pick up their share of the slack towards the end. earlier this week, when the mets blew a 7-run lead to lose to the phils 8-7 in 13, it was partly because after jumping to a 7-0 lead after 4 innings, the offense put nothing across over the next 9.
1 game up with 26 left to play. not much breathing room. at least there's no chance of a blowout like last season, because with this bullpen, there's no chance we'll be up more than a few games at any point for the rest of this year (if we're lucky). here's hoping we can hold on.
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
best seats in the house
you might have heard that this is the last year for shea stadium (and that other stadium up in the bronx). new stadium called citi field is being built in what was once one of the shea parking lots, and will open for the 2009 season. shea will go away to make more parking room, but because of building codes in NYC, the old stadium cannot be imploded and must be disassembled.
ostensibly to raise money for the "mets foundation" (whatever that is) and to offer a once-in-a-lifetime memorabilia opportunity to fans, the seats from shea are being sold in pairs to any and all comers.
took the leap and ordered mine yesterday as soon as they went on sale to the general public at 9am. purchased a pair of orange field level seats. thought about getting the red upper-deck seats to remind me of the times we'd go when i was a kid and pay $3 for day-of-game tickets. but, red's not really the color associated with los mets, so i opted for the more traditional orange. i was sure the seats would sell out quickly (hence my 9am purchase yesterday), but it appears only the orange ones have sold out so far. a disappointing commentary on met fans in general, i think.
seats will reportedly be shipped 8-12 weeks after the final game at shea. hoping for a january delivery, which would mean that last game was played in late october.
ostensibly to raise money for the "mets foundation" (whatever that is) and to offer a once-in-a-lifetime memorabilia opportunity to fans, the seats from shea are being sold in pairs to any and all comers.
took the leap and ordered mine yesterday as soon as they went on sale to the general public at 9am. purchased a pair of orange field level seats. thought about getting the red upper-deck seats to remind me of the times we'd go when i was a kid and pay $3 for day-of-game tickets. but, red's not really the color associated with los mets, so i opted for the more traditional orange. i was sure the seats would sell out quickly (hence my 9am purchase yesterday), but it appears only the orange ones have sold out so far. a disappointing commentary on met fans in general, i think.
seats will reportedly be shipped 8-12 weeks after the final game at shea. hoping for a january delivery, which would mean that last game was played in late october.
Monday, August 25, 2008
the prodigal family returneth
the weary travelers rolled in on thurs night, and it's like they never left. back to the usual routine of pokemon and legos, with a little wiffle ball mixed in. one more week until school starts for the boys, then molly starts preschool the week after that.
still getting bits and pieces of information from them at various times about their journey- fun to see what triggers those memories. best line had to be from molly, though, who upon getting ready for bed on thurs night when they returned, looked for a place in her room to put her dirty laundry and asked "how long are we going to be here?"
still getting bits and pieces of information from them at various times about their journey- fun to see what triggers those memories. best line had to be from molly, though, who upon getting ready for bed on thurs night when they returned, looked for a place in her room to put her dirty laundry and asked "how long are we going to be here?"
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
too good to be true
looks like muxtape is down for a bit. seems the RIAA has a problem with the way the site is set up- even though clicking on each track would give you the option of buying it on amazon, there was no limit to how much you could listen to anything. hopefully they'll work things out, because i just was informed of a way (thanks teej) of converting all my music files to shareable mp3's. dj phyngck was about to start mad spinning.
bachelor summer ends tomorrow! the fam is en route to ohio, last stop before they make the final leg of the journey tomorrow. ETA is sometime in the late evening. got about 30 hours to fill the fridge, clean the kitchen, and get things tidied up. can't wait for the stories.
bachelor summer ends tomorrow! the fam is en route to ohio, last stop before they make the final leg of the journey tomorrow. ETA is sometime in the late evening. got about 30 hours to fill the fridge, clean the kitchen, and get things tidied up. can't wait for the stories.
Friday, August 15, 2008
just because we didn't think of it doesn't mean it's not a great idea
baseball has often been identified as the sport most tied to its traditions and history. it's come up a lot recently with the arguments over instant replay in baseball, and tradition (or unnecessary adherence to it) has been for years a central point in the argument for or against the DH.
just this morning, i read about the US baseball team's loss to cuba in the olympics and learned of a new rule instituted to avoid limitless extra inning games. per the article: "International baseball's new extra-innings rule was used for the first time Friday. Beginning in the 11th inning, runners go to first and second and teams can start at any point in their batting order." (this rule is quite similar to the overtime format in college football, where each team starts with the ball on the 25 yard line until the tie is broken.)
i love this rule. i love free baseball as much as the next guy, but long extra-inning games are more of a war of attrition than any kind of skilled victory. sure, managing a bullpen takes some savvy, but most games that go past 14-15 innings are beyond managerial skill and are left to chance.
having this overtime system in play would save wear and tear on bullpens and would likely see the end of position players having to pitch. it would still require plenty of managerial acumen, as saving the right guys for the overtime would come in to play. the international rule allows for only one true extra inning, which i think is a little stingy. in finkworld, the overtime would go into effect after 3 extra innings (i.e. the 13th inning). or, maybe we'd start in the 11th as they do, but do it progressively- for the 11th, you could start your lineup anywhere but have no one on base, for the 12th you'd get a guy on first and start the lineup anywhere, and the 13th 2 guys on.
"tradition" will keep this from ever happening, and the pitchers' lobby will be sure of that. (this system would not go over well with pitchers, but would be great for middle-of-the-order guys looking to increase their numbers since they'd likely get an AB in each extra inning.)
but who knows- if baseball does implement replay this year, as is widely expected, it shows that as long as fans and players put up enough of a stink, even tradition can be put aside for the good of the game.
just this morning, i read about the US baseball team's loss to cuba in the olympics and learned of a new rule instituted to avoid limitless extra inning games. per the article: "International baseball's new extra-innings rule was used for the first time Friday. Beginning in the 11th inning, runners go to first and second and teams can start at any point in their batting order." (this rule is quite similar to the overtime format in college football, where each team starts with the ball on the 25 yard line until the tie is broken.)
i love this rule. i love free baseball as much as the next guy, but long extra-inning games are more of a war of attrition than any kind of skilled victory. sure, managing a bullpen takes some savvy, but most games that go past 14-15 innings are beyond managerial skill and are left to chance.
having this overtime system in play would save wear and tear on bullpens and would likely see the end of position players having to pitch. it would still require plenty of managerial acumen, as saving the right guys for the overtime would come in to play. the international rule allows for only one true extra inning, which i think is a little stingy. in finkworld, the overtime would go into effect after 3 extra innings (i.e. the 13th inning). or, maybe we'd start in the 11th as they do, but do it progressively- for the 11th, you could start your lineup anywhere but have no one on base, for the 12th you'd get a guy on first and start the lineup anywhere, and the 13th 2 guys on.
"tradition" will keep this from ever happening, and the pitchers' lobby will be sure of that. (this system would not go over well with pitchers, but would be great for middle-of-the-order guys looking to increase their numbers since they'd likely get an AB in each extra inning.)
but who knows- if baseball does implement replay this year, as is widely expected, it shows that as long as fans and players put up enough of a stink, even tradition can be put aside for the good of the game.
Thursday, August 14, 2008
olympic fever
i've loved the olympics since the first ones i remember- the 1980 winter games in lake placid. being a new yorker, and one who vacationed in the adirondacks, there was a great connection to those games. certainly the hockey team and the eric heiden 5-medal haul were big factors in the allure of those games for americans, but i was drawn to the pageantry, the national pride, the international flair, and the olympic spirit that make the games more than just a world championship of sport.
the boycott of the moscow games deprived me of experiencing the summer olympics until '84, but being in LA there was again that sense of nationalism that made the games even bigger. and being 4 years older, i was able to appreciate it even more. i remember loving the sheer diversity of events in the summer games. for someone who was the furthest thing from a swimmer, runner, or gymnast, events like archery, rowing and javelin were appealing because they seemed reachable.
since then, i've watched each olympics with enthusiasm and interest. still prefer the winter games to the summer, but i find myself attached to the TV this week, watching plenty of swimming and gymnastics- two things that as exciting and artistic as they may be, i'll likely never watch at any other time during the next 4 years.
the downside to NBC's "more hours that in real life" coverage is that because they want you to tune in to their prime time broadcast, none of their affiliates are showing any events during the evening hours. i'd love to watch some fencing, or weightlifting, or table tennis, even if it were taped. maybe i'll have to start setting the tivo. then i may not leave the couch until labor day.
the boycott of the moscow games deprived me of experiencing the summer olympics until '84, but being in LA there was again that sense of nationalism that made the games even bigger. and being 4 years older, i was able to appreciate it even more. i remember loving the sheer diversity of events in the summer games. for someone who was the furthest thing from a swimmer, runner, or gymnast, events like archery, rowing and javelin were appealing because they seemed reachable.
since then, i've watched each olympics with enthusiasm and interest. still prefer the winter games to the summer, but i find myself attached to the TV this week, watching plenty of swimming and gymnastics- two things that as exciting and artistic as they may be, i'll likely never watch at any other time during the next 4 years.
the downside to NBC's "more hours that in real life" coverage is that because they want you to tune in to their prime time broadcast, none of their affiliates are showing any events during the evening hours. i'd love to watch some fencing, or weightlifting, or table tennis, even if it were taped. maybe i'll have to start setting the tivo. then i may not leave the couch until labor day.
Sunday, August 10, 2008
the best kind of music
...is free music. (similar, of course, to the best kind of beer) happened to be at my local public library a few months ago and was trolling through the cd case while the kids were book hunting. pleasantly surprised to find a few discs that i've always wanted but never actually purchased- some u2, white stripes. also found a few soundtracks with individual songs that caught my eye.
since then, i've made a few trips back and picked up different CDs, mostly soundtracks, and have been importing tracks to my itunes catalog. i'm a big fan of cover songs (a top 5 post someday on that one), and soundtracks are a gold mine for completely random cover songs. the great thing about the library gig is that these CDs usually only have one or two worthwile songs, so it saves buying the whole disc.
i'm also a big fan of christmas music, and i've also been scooping up the library's collection of christmas discs and ripping them too. figure i'll beat the december rush this way.
since then, i've made a few trips back and picked up different CDs, mostly soundtracks, and have been importing tracks to my itunes catalog. i'm a big fan of cover songs (a top 5 post someday on that one), and soundtracks are a gold mine for completely random cover songs. the great thing about the library gig is that these CDs usually only have one or two worthwile songs, so it saves buying the whole disc.
i'm also a big fan of christmas music, and i've also been scooping up the library's collection of christmas discs and ripping them too. figure i'll beat the december rush this way.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
election 2008: health care, part 2
never listen to me when i promise to post "tomorrow"...
here in the second half of health care discussion, i'll present the position of barack obama. obama goes into good detail on his site about his health care plan, and outlines it even more in this position paper. his plan was presented initially during a speech in iowa last year, a speech which is the usual cut-and-paste politician speech: start with the depressing story of a local couple, outline in detail and with lots of statistics the issue at hand, give your background and previous accomplishments with regards to the issue, outline your new plan, resurrect the ghosts of political heroes gone by, then bring back the local couple and inspire hope that your plan will save them.
obama plans to insure all americans by enrolling all those without insurance in the same insurance plan open to all federal employees. eligible citizens will receive a federal stipend to join the program. he plans to finance the plan by doing away with the bush tax cut for the wealthy, and by having businesses who don't offer a "meaningful contribution" to employee health care contribute "a percentage of payroll" (i.e. taxing business). i presume this new payroll tax is meant to stimulate businesses to participate in private insurance. he also pledges to support businesses with federal money for catastrophic coverage.
obama also feels there's money to be made by optimizing health care- he (like mccain) supports a movement toward electronic medical records, and focusing on preventative medicine. obama's plan calls for what he calls "incentives for excellence". in his speech and position paper, he speaks of how much money is wasted on suboptimal care and preventable complications. in his plan, providers will be "rewarded for achieving performance thresholds on outcome measures". this is what is usually referred to as "pay for performance" and it is a noble but miserable idea.
[a sidebar on P4P, as it is called in the industry. no payer, whether private or government, has the resources to pay extra. so while it seems nice that providers who perform well will be "rewarded", it means that there will need to be providers who will be "punished"- read: reimbursed less- for not meeting metrics. in a perfect world, we'd make everybody better, and maybe we could all achieve the benchmarks set. but because many patients are either too sick or too non-compliant to ever meet a benchmark, there will be a population of people who will never be "at goal". having too many of these folks in a practice will hurt the bottom line of the doctors who care for them. those doctors don't want to wind up in that bottom group who will be "punished", so they will weed out the "bad patients". the logical path of P4P is a selection by providers of healthy, compliant patients and a spurning of complicated, non-compliant patients who bring down performance numbers. this leaves a pool of people who need doctors the most but will not be able to find anyone to care for them. that's an improvement?]
back to the plan- lots of fluff about protecting kids from lead and pregnant women from mercury (the metal, not the planet), fighting aids, helping disabled americans, and a little blurb about "prevent(ing) insurers from overcharging physicians for their malpractice insurance". not a word about tort reform and reducing frivolous lawsuits though.
there's lots of stuff he wants to do, and even if all he puts through is his national health plan, the costs will be astronomical. i realize that before medicare was rolled out, it was probably met with much the same skepticism, but i just think that if there's a proposal for such a big policy, it should be offered with a realistic "we've all got to pitch in" financial plan rather than "we'll tax businesses and the rich, and it'll be OK" plan.
so when i try to pick a side here, while mccain's plan amounts to really nothing, at least it doesn't set us back. i think obama's plan is a bit overzealous, and the whole P4P thing really frightens me (in case you hadn't guessed). after one round then, the voting so far in the fink electoral poll is mccain 1, obama 0.
please, please follow the links to the candidate's pages and read the policies yourselves. it takes a bit to get through, and a keen eye to read between the lines, but it is well worth it.
this was fun- next topic soon- got a lot to get through before november.
here in the second half of health care discussion, i'll present the position of barack obama. obama goes into good detail on his site about his health care plan, and outlines it even more in this position paper. his plan was presented initially during a speech in iowa last year, a speech which is the usual cut-and-paste politician speech: start with the depressing story of a local couple, outline in detail and with lots of statistics the issue at hand, give your background and previous accomplishments with regards to the issue, outline your new plan, resurrect the ghosts of political heroes gone by, then bring back the local couple and inspire hope that your plan will save them.
obama plans to insure all americans by enrolling all those without insurance in the same insurance plan open to all federal employees. eligible citizens will receive a federal stipend to join the program. he plans to finance the plan by doing away with the bush tax cut for the wealthy, and by having businesses who don't offer a "meaningful contribution" to employee health care contribute "a percentage of payroll" (i.e. taxing business). i presume this new payroll tax is meant to stimulate businesses to participate in private insurance. he also pledges to support businesses with federal money for catastrophic coverage.
obama also feels there's money to be made by optimizing health care- he (like mccain) supports a movement toward electronic medical records, and focusing on preventative medicine. obama's plan calls for what he calls "incentives for excellence". in his speech and position paper, he speaks of how much money is wasted on suboptimal care and preventable complications. in his plan, providers will be "rewarded for achieving performance thresholds on outcome measures". this is what is usually referred to as "pay for performance" and it is a noble but miserable idea.
[a sidebar on P4P, as it is called in the industry. no payer, whether private or government, has the resources to pay extra. so while it seems nice that providers who perform well will be "rewarded", it means that there will need to be providers who will be "punished"- read: reimbursed less- for not meeting metrics. in a perfect world, we'd make everybody better, and maybe we could all achieve the benchmarks set. but because many patients are either too sick or too non-compliant to ever meet a benchmark, there will be a population of people who will never be "at goal". having too many of these folks in a practice will hurt the bottom line of the doctors who care for them. those doctors don't want to wind up in that bottom group who will be "punished", so they will weed out the "bad patients". the logical path of P4P is a selection by providers of healthy, compliant patients and a spurning of complicated, non-compliant patients who bring down performance numbers. this leaves a pool of people who need doctors the most but will not be able to find anyone to care for them. that's an improvement?]
back to the plan- lots of fluff about protecting kids from lead and pregnant women from mercury (the metal, not the planet), fighting aids, helping disabled americans, and a little blurb about "prevent(ing) insurers from overcharging physicians for their malpractice insurance". not a word about tort reform and reducing frivolous lawsuits though.
there's lots of stuff he wants to do, and even if all he puts through is his national health plan, the costs will be astronomical. i realize that before medicare was rolled out, it was probably met with much the same skepticism, but i just think that if there's a proposal for such a big policy, it should be offered with a realistic "we've all got to pitch in" financial plan rather than "we'll tax businesses and the rich, and it'll be OK" plan.
so when i try to pick a side here, while mccain's plan amounts to really nothing, at least it doesn't set us back. i think obama's plan is a bit overzealous, and the whole P4P thing really frightens me (in case you hadn't guessed). after one round then, the voting so far in the fink electoral poll is mccain 1, obama 0.
please, please follow the links to the candidate's pages and read the policies yourselves. it takes a bit to get through, and a keen eye to read between the lines, but it is well worth it.
this was fun- next topic soon- got a lot to get through before november.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)