a tale of two cities

somewhere in lower manhattan today, david wright woke up around two p.m. still reeking of piss and wild turkey from the atrabilious night before. streaks of eye black still ran down his cheeks, courtesy of the river of tears that turned him from a pretty boy third baseman to an alice cooper look-alike. he clapped twice to turn on the projection screen TV just past the foot of the bed, quickly navigated past the channels of the ESPN family to avoid any sight of the previous afternoon's events, and stopped on CNBC to check how his abercrombie and fitch stock was performing. he rubbed his eyes, not sure if the smeared eye black was somehow distorting his view of the ticker, then stared agape when he realized the carnage befalling wall street. taking a swill from the warm half-empty bottle of miller chill on the nightstand, he muttered to himself, "thank god i'm not a stockbroker", then pulled the sheets over his head and went back to sleep, content with the knowledge that someone not in orange and blue would be on the cover of the post tomorrow.

election 2008: debate #1

i'm not avoiding the obvious post on the collapse of the mets, i'm just fulfilling my promise to promptly report on the debates as they happen. honest.

watched the whole of friday's debate live. i took no notes, because no average american does, and haven't and won't read any transcripts, because i want to remember the debate as an average american would.

from the outset, it was clear that moderator jim lehrer was intent on having a debate filled with banter and interaction between the candidates. the candidates, especially mccain, were not interested in that. (i know the candidates were not privy to the questions in advance, but if it was expressed to them in advance that this was the kind of debate lehrer was looking for, they intentionally made it difficult for him by opting for a standing-at-podium-style debate rather than a seated one.)

it was meant to be a foreign policy debate but because of the recent financial crisis and the bailout plan in congress at the time, the first 40 minutes of the 90 minute debate focused on the bailout plan and the struggling economy in general. with regards to the bailout plan, neither candidate cared to elaborate on details they preferred, but expressed faith that a good plan would come out of negotiations. when asked what they'd cut from their presidential wish lists to pay for the bailout, obama couldn't list a single thing. mccain talked about spending freezes and getting rid of pork barrel spending. the cuts he mentioned were cuts he planned on anyway, so didn't really answer the question he was asked.

each candidate tried to sneak in bits and pieces of their domestic policy into their answers on the financial crisis. energy independence seemed to be a hot topic, and a few mentions of reforming health care as a means to save money were made by obama. overall, i don't think i heard enough from either candidate that would sway me towards one or away from the other on the domestic side.

foreign policy was where the fireworks came out. the basics of the candidates' foreign policies are: obama- focus on afghanistan, let the iraqis run iraq, begin diplomatic proceedings with rogue states; mccain- focus on iraq, increase presence in afghanistan but not at the expense of the iraq theatre, no diplomacy with rogue states. mccain repeatedly name-dropped and place-dropped, playing his experience card while exploiting obama's lack thereof. i'm not sure just knowing the names of foreign leaders or saying you've been somewhere makes you more qualified, but it's hard to discredit 25 years of experience on the world stage.

as a debate, i thought obama's presence helped him early, but mccain fought back hard throughout the foreign policy section. since this post is more an evaluation of the debate itself than the content, my final evaluation is what i think the perception of the average american would be. scoring it like a boxing round, i've got mccain winning 10-9 on my card on the strength of his attacks towards the end.

flashback

it's after midnight- can't sleep, all fired up after another devastating loss by the mets. got up to re-read one of my favorite posts, coincidentally from a year ago today.

a favorite because i like the way it's written, but also because it's a good one for me to go back and read every so often.

4 more games left in the regular season- i may be re-reading this post daily if this keeps up.

technical difficulties, please stand by

been having some access problems at work these past few weeks- can't seem to get my laptop to connect to our wireless network. quite frustrating. hope to fix the problem soon, and get to posting more in the near future. lots of topics to cover before the election.

keep checking in- i'll be back on track soon.

for dessert, astronaut ice cream

i thought about posting today about the candidate's positions on the economy, but i couldn't bring myself to do it. too depressing. so, i present you with some lighter fare.

in no particular order, the top 5 foods that sound to me like they could be on a martian middle school lunch menu:

5) gravlax
4) dolmas
3) pad thai
2) chicken tikka (even martians would have chicken as a lunchroom staple)
1) scrapple


and for my first ever embedded video, the coolest physics teacher ever:

election 2008: immigration

obama calls the issue "immigration" on his website, mccain calls it "border security and immigration". that's about where the candidates differ the most, because as far as i can see it, their plans for reform aren't that dissimilar.

both candidates support reinforcing border security with manpower, financial aid, and technology. obama says nothing more than just that; mccain suggests he'll spend money on unmanned patrols of the border and subsidies to US attorneys in border states. both candidates support an employment eligibility system for businesses to verify the immigration status of employees. obama just says he'll "crack down" on employers who hire illegals, mccain supports their aggressive prosecution.

with regards to the immigration system, both support streamlining the process, with mccain giving some detail and breaking down immigrant workers into several groups- highly skilled, low-skilled non-agricultural, and low-skilled agricultural. his suggestion for the last group, however, is the quite vague promise of providing "a non-bureaucratic, adaptable, useable program that is reflective of market needs and protects both the immigrant and US workers". translation- "we'll conveniently ignore this group, since we know our food supply system would collapse if we cut off the supply of illegal workers in agriculture". at least mccain gives it a shot though- obama doesn't address the topic at all.

neither candidate supports a mass deportation of illegals. rather, they both would ask that all illegals be accounted for, be asked to learn english, pay a fine, and be offered a chance at citizenship after all others who are currently in the system. mccain gives a little more language about weeding out those with criminal records or who have used ill-gotten social security numbers.

obama gives additional points about working with mexico to promote their economic development as a way of decreasing illegal immigration and to expedite the citizenship process for immigrants who serve in the military.

in summary, i'm struggling to find much difference between the candidates on this point. i'll have to call it a push for now, and see how it plays out during the debates.

pass the can

another fleeting memory of days gone by popped into my head the other day. not sure why i was thinking of it, but i had this great memory of the summer theater fundraising campaign for the will rogers institute.

there was a time, probably when i was about 13 or 14, that i would ride my bike to the mall with a friend or two and see a movie almost weekly during the summer. the multiplex at the mall participated in the fundraising campaign, which involved a trailer starring usually one or two a-list celebs of the day telling the story of will rogers and his eponymous institute. the trailer would end with the celeb shaking a coffee can emblazoned with the will rogers logo and announcing that ushers would now be passing the cans. house lights would come up again for a few minutes while people dug for change and passed the cans, then dimmed again once the collection was over so the movie could start.

apparently this is still done, as the website attests. while i don't go to the movies nearly as much anymore, it's been quite a while since i've seen the will rogers promo. anybody else remember these, or seen one in the past 10 years?