physician, heal thyself

getting my late winter cold a few months early this year. started with just a scratchy throat last thursday, and has progressed to general misery, mostly in the head and neck. sound worse than i feel, but i have no voice. (good thing this isn't an audio blog).

thanks to the hoarseness i got a remark from just about every patient today, more than half quipping unoriginally "you need to see a doctor!" the other half thought i had been rooting too hard for the phillies. i of course told them i'd rather have tuberculosis than root for the phillies, and if they insinuated similarly again, i'd cough in their general direction.

6 quirks

got tagged a while back by n., she of lovemomworklife, to post about 6 unspectacular quirks about me. "tagging" amongst bloggers is equivalent to chain letters, and i'm really supposed to "tag" 6 others now. don't have enough people to keep the chain going, but i will go ahead and post my quirks, because i think it's a fun idea.

1) i love peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, but they should be made with skippy peanut butter and welch's jelly (NEVER jam), and always accompanied by a glass of milk
2) i can sleep on either my right or left side, but i must face the outside of the bed
3) i eat ice cream with a teaspoon and cereal with a soup spoon, no exceptions
4) i can't watch half a movie. i've never left a movie in the theater, and won't start a movie on DVD unless i can finish the whole thing
5) i always keep the money in my wallet in denominational order, from lowest to highest, all facing the same direction
6) while i may forget the names of people or places, i almost always know how many letters are in the name of the thing i'm trying to remember

you can see n.'s 6 here and googs' 6 here. show us yours- leave your 6 in the comments section.

can it really be "classic" if one team has only been around for 10 years?

as you know, i love baseball. and despite the b-list headliners of this year's fall classic, i'll be watching every game. plenty of reasons to watch, not the least of which to root, root, root against the hated phillies and their fairweather, bandwagon fans.

granted, the rays were a team that could barely attract 10K people even earlier this season and now fill their awful domed stadium with bandwagon hangers-on. but philadelphia fans are different. they come out of the woodwork every time a team of theirs gets into the playoffs and cry about how long it's been since their town has had a champion. happened all those years that the eagles were making it to championship games, and now that the phillies have a chance, it's resurgent again.

i say, if the phillie phaithful want to see a local champion, they can suck down a cheesesteak while watching the DVD of the philadelphia soul's arena football championship season from last year. let the rays join the '69 mets in the lovable-former-loser's hall of champions.

falling into the season

finally had some fall-like weather around here, with temps barely cracking 60 this weekend. celebrated it appropriately enough by hitting the pumpkin patch today. googs and rachel were up from DC for a visit, so the 7 of us went across town to visit the local agri-tainment farm. a short hay ride, some apple cider, pick-your-own indian corn, and plenty of pumpkins of all varieties.

mentioned the other day that i've got the running bug after watching erin in chicago. to help keep myself honest, i decided to keep a running diary, and what better way to do that than with a blog. i can't promise any scintillating, insightful posts, but if you're interested in following my progress towards chicago 2009, check out the newest flog*, finkathon.

*fink blog, of course.

election 2008: debate #3

a two-for-one post day, so i can hold up my pledge to respond to each debate.

enjoyed last night's debate a little more than the previous one. for starters, i thought the format was great, and i thought bob schieffer did a great job. i thought he missed a few opportunities to chase them down a little more, but overall i thought he was unbiased and fair with his questioning.

from the candidates, the rhetoric was all the same, most of it right down to the sound bites that are all too familiar now- "the same kind of insurance senator mccain and i enjoy", "clean coal, solar, biodiesel, wind...", etc. even the newest proposals, those regarding the recovery plans for the falling economy didn't seem to offer much of anything new. like with the last debate, i think i was too familiar with each candidate's policies and plans to get anything out of their context.

i did, however, gain a lot by watching these men in their attitudes towards each other. the longer this campaign goes on, the more mccain comes across as a grumpy old man. his tone of voice, his snide comments, and his annoying smirks give the impression that he's completely fed up with obama. on the times when obama gave his negative opinions of mccain's plans, he gave straightforward opinions of why he felt those choices would not work. when mccain brought up perceived flaws in the obama plan, he did so with a sense of incredulity and arrogance that those suggestions would even be made. this kind of attitude does not exactly match up with the open-minded, reach-across-the-aisle persona that he is trying to portray. worse, it insinuates an inability to negotiate with adversaries, a quality that a presidant can ill afford.

time is winding down, and as you can see from my lack of recent posts, i've not found my own time to comment more on this election. i'd like to put up another comparitive post or two on policies, but as much as i wanted my vote decided only on issues, i'm having a difficult time separating the subjective from the objective. this ship is listing to port, and it will take a strong wind in the next 3 weeks to change the course to starboard.

runner's high

still trying to catch up after spending the past weekend in chicago watching my beloved run her 5th marathon. an awesome, inspiring event. erin and our friend bryan (fellow hoya M'97) ran on sunday, while their respective spouses (myself and bryan's wife cindy) and a gaggle of other hoyas were in attendance to cheer them on. one of them went so far as to run the last 6.2 with erin- thanks, maguire.

the chicago marathon is truly a spectacle. 33,000 people running a viewer-friendly course through a great city. so inspiring, in fact, that i've pledged to run it next year. a while back i ran the san diego marathon and while it was certainly an achievement, the entirety of the event itself coupled with my less-than-kenyan performance made me immediately want to have another crack at a marathon someday. so here i am, 8 years later, finally with enough inspiration to make it happen.

thanks, erin.

election 2008: debate #2

i think the banner headline on drudgereport.com last night summed it up best: "BORING!" if the VP debate frustrated me, this debate annoyed me. fortunately, i missed the first 40 minutes and was subjected to only the second half. don't think i missed very much from what i've read.

the only thing i learned last night was that mccain's disdain for obama seems to be growing by the day. maybe the third and final debate will provide more insight into the candidates, but i'm not hopeful after watching their behavior yesterday.

there's always next year (though that's what we said last year)

"could've been so beautiful, could've been so right" - tiffany, "could've been"

you know it's bad when you start your post quoting tiffany. but that's how messed up my mind is tonight. see, here's what came in the mail the other day...




it's where i should be tonight- at game #3 of the NLDS against the cubs. never been to a playoff game before, and finally got my chance. i won the online lottery to purchase tickets for the NLDS (this was of course before the flushing in flushing), and bought 4 tickets to the first home game. figuring the mets would take the wild card, by choosing home game 1 i'd get to see game #3, which would have been tonight at shea. best case scenario, mets take 2 in chicago and have a chance to win the series. next best case, they split in chicago and come home for a meaningful game. worst case, they lose 2 in chicago and i get to see possibly the last game ever at shea. instead, i am at home tonight, rooting hard for the brewers, downhearted like all other met faithful.

well, perhaps some are a little more than just downhearted.

election 2008: vice-presidential debate

at some point during last night's debate, i realized that the experience was not unlike watching a NASCAR race: i was watching the competitors going round and round in circles, waiting for one of them to crash. made it a little less exciting since neither of them truly crashed, but i think something may have been gained in the exercise.

first off, some comments on the moderator, gwen ifill. a wonderful woman, i'm sure, but if i were in the mccain camp, i'd be furious. i didn't keep track, but if i had to guess, ifill offered the last word to joe biden on at least 80% of the questions she asked, regardless of who was asked the question first. maybe some of that blame can be shifted to palin, who seemed to not use all of her allotted time on more than one occasion, but i think the disproportionate opportunities for rebuttal by biden were glaring. i think ifill also could have pressed each candidate further during the free time after the 90-second answers were given.

regarding the debaters, it was interesting to watch the differences in style. from the outset, biden looked directly at ifill when answering questions and rarely at the camera, while palin looked directly at the camera almost immediately after she began speaking each time. biden used the camera more so as the debate went on, but only when he had aggressive points to make, which came off as harsh and negative. palin came across as speaking directly to the public, which was clearly intentional. because her style was smooth and pleasant, her points seemed more substantive than they truly were.

this debate frustrated me. i think biden had more substance, but it was hard to tell because he blew much of his credibility with his style. he kept tripping over words, needlessly repeated phrases, and ranted about "fundamental" differences so much that the term got watered down. he refused to acknowledge any potential differences between himself and obama. biden insisted he and obama have always been of the same opinions on iraq, although their voting records demonstrate otherwise. palin hit him hard on that, calling out his kerry-esque reversal given his aye vote on the war resolution. biden could have defended himself better but chose to lose face to defend the ticket. it painted a wishy-washy picture which i think weakened biden a good bit.

palin, to me, had nothing to say. she brought up the points she was coached to bring up, and made them well. it infuriated me when she said something like "i may not answer the questions directly as you or the moderator would like me to", and she kept her promise. she repeatedly brought up unrelated topics and harped on "energy independence" as if it were the answer to all the world's problems. often, her answers started well but turned to canned fluff (shout-outs to all her buddies in alaska), and on one occasion (don't remember the question) she just rambled for all her alloted time with a bunch of patriotic cheez-whiz and not a single salient point. she came off as as a promoter for the ticket, someone like giuliani or romney, rather than someone on the ticket herself.

and then, she said it. the one thing about this current president that drives me crazier than anything, and palin said it. during an answer to a question about the dangers of pakistan and iran, palin dropped the N-bomb: "nucular". i didn't want to believe it at first, but she said it again. "nucular". and again. "nucular". and again. "nucular". there is one and only one way to pronounce the word "nuclear"- just as it's written, with the "l" right after the "c". our current president doesn't seem to understand that, and unfortunately, it seems mrs. palin doesn't either. it is extremely hard for me have faith that someone can comprehend the intricacies and ramifications of nuclear proliferation if they cannot even pronounce the damn word.

here's my bottom-line interpretation: biden is a good guy with a strong background of service who is afraid to say where he differs with obama for fear of presenting a divided ticket. palin is a wonderful public speaker, and i'm sure the best gosh-darn cookie-makin', baby-totin', moose-killin' hockey mom up there in juneau, but someone who has no right being a proverbial heartbeat away from running the free world.

almost every pundit i watched last night before and after the debate made the point that while VP debates may be interesting, they don't affect the election at all; people vote on the presidential candidates, not the VP's. unless i am given reason to be swayed differently between now and nov. 4, i may be the exception to that rule.