at the risk of starting a war of words in the comments section between wiley and 2white, i feel obliged to acknowledge the recent developments in the life of one alex rodriguez.
first of all, this news should come as no surprise to anyone who follows baseball. i've yet to see any of those before/after photos of a-rod, like the ones that sports outlets love to put up on bonds and clemens, but it's fair to say that a-rod now is nothing compared to the lanky shortstop that came up with the mariners. in a league where performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) were/are rampant, it's foolish to believe that after signing that almost immoral $250M contract, a-rod would have just turned his head and taken the moral high ground when presented with the temptation to cheat to succeed.
the signing of that contract, along with his antics on and off the field in NY, establish a-rod as a person with extremely low self-esteem. that low self-esteem was no doubt what drove him to feel the pressure to "'roid up", so as to avoid the ridicule that failure would bring after signing for 1/4 billion.
i give him some credit for owing up so fast. sure he's known for 5 years that there's a positive test on him, but if MLB wasn't going to leak it, why would he? his cop-out excuse seems lame, but i'm sure it's true- just make sure you interpret his feeling of "pressure" as more accurately an "immature fear of failure and loss of stature".
MLB is the real loser here. a-rod is the anchor brick in their steroid jenga tower- it all comes down now. there's no reason to believe that the 90's and early 00's were anything but a PED-fueled power trip. MLB must acknowlege that, acknowledge their outward denial, and allow all the records to stand and all the players during that period to be treated as equals. either that, or disavow the whole decade and a half and start anew.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
No war of words from me. I'm satisfied with ARod's admission. Time to move on.
Now if Arod had said he supported this stimulus bill...
What drives me crazy about media attention on steroids and other "performance enhancing drugs" is that there is little fundamental difference between steroids and other technological and medical advances that media does not think twice about.
For example, how is taking a pain killer that allows someone to play better fundamentally different than taking a steroid that allows someone to play better?
Now before people harp on legal issues, understand that I know that steroids can be illegal and can be against the rules of a sport. But, what everyone needs to understand is that the legality of a substance is NOT a fundamental quality of that substance. Whether a substance/drug is legal or illegal is wholly a decision made by humans, so it is never a fundamental quality to the drug.
The first member of the media who can offer a logical explanation about the fundamental difference between taking steroids and taking pain killers in order to play better will be the first person in the world to do so.
there's certainly a double standard when it comes to steroids and all other performance enhancers. the argument comes down to whether or not the performance enhancement is coming under the direction of a physician. LASIK surgery? legit. joint injections? legit, when done by a doc. amphetamines? not legit.
there may be no fundamental difference between steroids and LASIK surgery with regard to the augmentation of an athlete's ability, but one is used illegally and one is provided by a physician. that's the problem that most of us have.
It's clear from this conversation that Barry Bonds is the best player of all time.
Post a Comment